Review Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Radioactive Waste Management and Safety Frameworks for VVER-1200 Reactors at the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant: A Comprehensive Review

Received: 22 October 2025     Accepted: 4 November 2025     Published: 10 April 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Bangladesh's entry into the nuclear age with the construction of its first commercial nuclear power project, the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant (RNPP), featuring two Generation III+ VVER-1200 units supplied by the Russian Federation, is a significant step towards achieving energy security. However, this significant technological advancement necessitates the parallel establishment of robust, internationally compliant strategies for the safe and sustainable management of radioactive waste (RW). This comprehensive review systematically synthesizes the proposed and implemented approaches for RW treatment, disposal, and regulatory oversight at the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant, providing a critical analysis of the country's "National Policy on Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel Management-2019" and associated bilateral agreements. The primary finding highlights the strategic success of the policy, which mandates the repatriation of all high-level waste (Spent Nuclear Fuel, SNF) back to Russia, thereby eliminating the nation's most significant long-term nuclear liability. This agreement effectively offloads the burden of managing an estimated 50-60 tons of highly radioactive waste annually (fuel inventory and discharge estimates commensurate with 2.4 GWe plant capacity). Conversely, the review focuses on the domestic challenge of managing Low and Intermediate-Level Waste (LILW), examining the specialized technical systems for treating solid radioactive waste (SRW), liquid radioactive waste (LRW), and gaseous waste, including solidification processes and interim storage plans. Furthermore, the paper critically outlines the required strengthening of the regulatory framework under the Bangladesh Atomic Energy Regulatory Authority (BAERA) and identifies critical long-term gaps. These gaps include the absence of a formalized repository for final disposal of Low and Intermediate-Level Waste, the need for fully capitalized financial assurance funds, and the necessity for sustained investment in institutional capacity and human resources. This review contributes a vital synthesis to the literature on nuclear new build programs, particularly for developing nations, by detailing strategic solutions and outlining the immediate technical, regulatory, and financial priorities required to ensure the long-term safety and sustainability of the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant.

Published in American Journal of Energy Engineering (Volume 14, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajee.20261402.11
Page(s) 45-55
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Radioactive Waste Management, Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant, Waste Treatment, Spent Nuclear Fuel, Bilateral Agreement, VVER-1200, Bangladesh Atomic Energy Regulatory Authority, International Atomic Energy Agency

1. Introduction
The Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant (RNPP), sometimes spelled Ruppur or Rooppur, is Bangladesh’s first commercial nuclear power project. This project aligns with the global trend of developing nations seeking to diversify their energy mix and secure baseload capacity through low-carbon nuclear energy. While nuclear energy offers substantial environmental benefits over fossil fuels, its expansion intrinsically links every new program to the complex and highly regulated challenge of radioactive waste (RW) management. This challenge encompasses all waste streams from low-activity materials used in operations (Low-Level Waste, LLW) to the highly radioactive and heat-generating Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF), which constitutes the High-Level Waste (HLW). The safe, long-term disposal of HLW is universally acknowledged as the most significant hurdle in the nuclear fuel cycle, requiring either deep geological repositories or strategic international agreements. The construction of the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant, which comprises two Generation III+ VVER-1200 reactors (2 × 1,200 MWe), represents a landmark commitment to energy security . Commissioning of these units and their full commercial operation has been a major national priority in recent years. As a new nuclear entrant, Bangladesh must ensure its radioactive waste management strategies are not only technically sound but also fully compliant with international safety standards and best practices established by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) .
While previous studies have addressed the general challenges and opportunities of nuclear power in Bangladesh and some have examined specific issues like radiological safety or public perception , there is a distinct lack of comprehensive literature that synthesizes the fragmented policy, regulatory and technical components into a single, cohesive framework for RNPP’s waste management. Existing national planning documents and bilateral agreements are dispersed and often lack the integrated analysis required for a complete safety case . Specifically, few published reviews consolidate the details of the National Policy on Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel Management-2019, the specifics of the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) for SNF repatriation and the status of domestic Low and Intermediate-Level Waste (LILW) treatment infrastructure into a critical evaluation .
This review addresses this critical gap by providing a comprehensive, single-source synthesis of the current status, policy decisions, technical equipment procurement and regulatory framework on RW management at the RNPP. The significance of this article lies in three areas: primarily, it provides a clear model for the strategic solution (supplier-return fuel cycle) adopted by new nuclear nations to manage HLW; moreover, it outlines the specific technical and regulatory steps required for domestic LILW management; and in the end, it delivers a set of high-priority, point-based conclusions and recommendations necessary to guide policy-makers and the regulatory body (BAERA) in ensuring the long-term safety, financial assurance and public acceptance of the program. This paper documents current arrangements, policy decisions, procurement of technical equipment, regulatory oversight, and outstanding needs for RNPP waste management, using publicly available sources. The following sections cover the plant’s technical specifications, waste categorization, treatment technologies, the regulatory landscape, on-site equipment and a final assessment of the residual challenges and gaps.
2. Radioactive Waste Management at the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant (RNPP)
2.1. Site Characteristics and Geomorphology
The Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant (RNPP) area in Iswardhi and Lokkhikunda, Pabna district, Bangladesh was located between 24°03’ and 24°15’ north latitudes and between 89°00’ and 89°11’ east longitudes, the westernmost upazila of Pabna District in Rajshahi Division. 120 km (75 miles) north of the capital, Dhaka. The area has a tropical monsoon climate with seasonality in rainfall distribution; the mean annual rainfall and temperature are 1872 mm and 36.8°C, respectively. The upazila occupies an area of 250.89 sq. km . It is bounded by Lalpur and Baraigram Upazila to the north, Kushtia Sadar and the Padma River to the south, Pabna Sadar and Atgharia Upazila to the east, Bheramara and Lalpur Upazila and the Padma River to the west.
Figure 1. Location of the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant area, Ishwardi, Pabna, Bangladesh .
2.2. Nuclear Technology: The VVER-1200
Figure 2. Generations of Nuclear Technologies .
Nuclear power technologies have evolved through several distinct generations, classified as Generation I, II, III, III+ and IV. Generation I reactors were early prototypes developed during the 1950s and 1960s, most of which have now been decommissioned. Generation II refers to commercial power reactors built mainly between the 1970s and 1990s, including widely deployed designs such as PWR, BWR, CANDU, AGR and VVER, typically operating for about 40 years . Generation III reactors represent advanced versions of these light-water systems, featuring improvements in fuel technology, thermal efficiency, modular construction, and safety systems, extending operational lifetimes to around 60 years. Generation III+ designs further enhance safety and reliability through evolutionary innovations and are the current standard for new nuclear builds worldwide. Looking ahead, Generation IV reactors, expected to emerge commercially around 2030, aim to achieve higher sustainability, efficiency, and inherent safety, marking the next frontier in nuclear energy development .
2.3. Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant Layout and VVER-1200 Specifications
Figure 3. Schematic layout of a typical VVER plant at Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant .
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of reactor head VVER-1200 Gen-III+ at Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant .
At the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant, advanced Russian technology is being implemented, with Rosatom serving as the main reactor supplier. The plant features the VVER-1200/V-523 model, whose reactor installation at RNPP Unit-1 began in 2018 . The VVER, formerly known as Water-Water Energetic Reactor (WWER), is a pressurized water reactor design developed in Russia, known for its high output and robust safety systems. Since the 1960s, Rosatom has constructed and supplied 67 VVER units worldwide. The V-523 model selected for Bangladesh represents the most powerful version of this series, capable of generating approximately 1,158 MWe per unit . Figures 3 and 4 illustrate the typical layout of a VVER nuclear plant and the schematic design of the VVER-1200 reactor head, respectively.
Table 1. Basic specification of RNPP and Key specifications of VVER-1200 Gen-III+ .

Parameters: Value/ Type

Parameters: Value/ Type

Project Owner: Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission (BAEC)

Design Service Life: 60 years (min.) to 90 years (max.)

Technology Supplier: Rosatom (Russian Federation)

Gross Electrical output: 1,200 MWe (per unit)

Reactor Type: VVER-1200 / V-523 (Generation III+)

Thermal output: 3,200 MWt (per unit)

Number of Reactors: 2 Units

Heat supply capacity: 300 MWt

Power Units 2: RNPP-I and RNPP-II

Plant Efficiency: >90%

Cooling Source: Padma River

Labor-Power Ratio: 0.35 to 0.5 person/MW

Cooling Infrastructure: 2 Natural Draft Cooling Towers

Fuel Campaigning Duration: 4 years (min.)

Net Electrical Output: approx. 1,158 MWe (per unit)

Max Fuel Burn-up: 60 MWd/kgU

Total Plant Capacity: 2,400 MWe (gross)

Refuelling Frequency: 12 to 18 months

2.4. Radioactive Waste Categorization
Figure 5. Radioactive waste categories of nuclear power plants.
Nuclear power plants generate several types of radioactive waste. Very low-level waste (VLLW) includes slightly contaminated materials such as clothing, filters and construction waste. Low-level waste (LLW) consists of items such as contaminated tools, resins and sludges with low activity . Intermediate-level waste (ILW) contains higher activity items, for example, reactor internals and some ion-exchange resins, which require shielding but not heat management. High-level waste (HLW), also referred to as spent nuclear fuel (SNF), consists of used fuel assemblies that are highly radioactive and generate significant heat, requiring cooling and shielding . These categories are standard and are used in planning for Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant (RNPP). Waste volumes depend on operational practices, fuel cycle choices and decommissioning strategies.
2.5. Hazards of Radioactive Waste
The main risk of radioactive waste arises from its radioactive emissions, which can cause both somatic and genetic damage to humans. Acute exposure to high radiation doses may result in immediate injuries, while long-term low-level exposure can lead to chronic effects such as leukemia, cancers, cataracts and developmental disorders. Environmentally, radioactive decay generates heat in deep geological repositories, altering subsurface temperature, fluid flow, and chemical conditions, which can affect rock stability and contaminant migration. Moreover, radionuclides may leach from waste containers into groundwater, eventually reaching the biosphere and posing long-term ecological and health hazards .
2.6. Radioactive Waste Treatment Stages
Figure 6. Radioactive Waste Treatment stages at Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant.
Various radioactive waste disposal methods such as deep-seabed disposal, polar ice sheet disposal, and space disposal have been explored. However, deep geological disposal is regarded as the most technically feasible, safe, cost-effective and environmentally responsible solution for managing high-level and long-lived radioactive wastes. Radioactive waste varies in type and activity, requiring specific treatment methods based on its physical form and radioactivity level. Generally, waste management includes the treatment of gaseous, liquid, and solid wastes. Radioactive gases are processed through filtration and adsorption systems to remove radionuclides before being safely released into the atmosphere within regulatory limits. Liquid radioactive waste, being highly mobile and corrosive, is treated using methods such as chemical precipitation, ion exchange, and electrodialysis to remove contaminants . The resulting residues are then solidified to immobilize radionuclides and ensure long-term stability. Effective solidification must provide mechanical strength, resistance to leaching, and ease of transport and storage to maintain safety throughout the waste’s lifecycle.
2.7. Estimated Magnitudes
Publicly available RNPP planning documents and national studies indicate that a typical commercial PWR/ VVER operation will generate measurable quantities of VLLW/ LLW/ ILW annually . That spent fuel accumulates each fuel cycle and requires either long-term on-site storage or re-routing to fuel suppliers. Specifically, based on IAEA estimates of 27 tons of HLW per 1000 MWe annually, the RNPP’s total capacity of 2.4 GWe (2,400 MWe) is expected to produce approximately 50 to 60 tons of high-level waste every year . Exact volumes for RNPP are part of the plant’s safety documentation and national planning; independent studies for RNPP propose interim storage for VLLW and strategies for spent fuel repatriation .
3. Regulatory and Safety Policy Frame-work for VVER-1200 Reactors
3.1. National Policy and Regulatory Bodies
Bangladesh has established a national policy on radioactive waste and spent fuel management, approved by the Cabinet in 2019, which outlines responsibilities for producers, interim storage and plans for long-term solutions . The BAERA is the national agency responsible for licensing, inspection and enforcing radiation and waste safety standards. The BAEC is a key implementing body and the owner/stakeholder of RNPP through Nuclear Power Plant Company Bangladesh Limited. The IAEA has carried out review missions, such as IRRS, to offer recommendations for strengthening regulatory oversight .
3.2. Key Policy Elements Relevant to RNPP
The 2019 policy requires waste producers to manage and store waste at their sites and to be capable of handling waste until government or designated facilities take over. Bangladesh and Russia signed an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) specifying that spent fuel from RNPP will be repatriated to Russia for temporary storage, reprocessing or other management, establishing a supplier-return fuel cycle . This is critical because it reduces the need for Bangladesh to host long-term spent fuel repositories.
4. On-site Waste Treatment and Technical Equipment for RNPP
4.1. Liquid Radioactive Waste Management Equipment
Contracts have been signed for the supply of equipment and systems to treat liquid radioactive wastes at Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant (RNPP). In mid-2022, Atomstroyexport (the general contractor) contracted Sverdniikhimmash (part of AtomEnergoMash) to design, manufacture and deliver liquid radioactive waste (LRW) treatment equipment, with delivery and pre-commissioning support planned between 2022 to 2023 . These systems typically include pre-filtration, chemical treatment, ion exchange, evaporation, and sludge handling modules, as well as conditioned waste packaging.
4.2. Solid and VLLW Handling Interim Storage
Studies and conference contributions indicate plans for an interim surface storage facility for very low-level waste (VLLW) at Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant (RNPP) to hold conditioned waste packages for monitoring and eventual disposal or release in accordance with regulatory limits. Interim storage design focuses on robust packaging, restricted access, environmental monitoring, and record-keeping .
4.3. Spent Fuel Handling and Repatriation Logistics
Under the IGA, spent fuel will be repatriated to Russia. Practically, this requires on-site systems for spent fuel pool cooling, drying and cask loading facilities, transport packaging consistent with international transport regulations, and secure logistics coordination for shipments to the supplier country . Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant (RNPP) design incorporates spent fuel pools and initial on-site storage capacity consistent with VVER-1200 designs, while long-term management leverages repatriation.
4.4. International Engagement and Safety Reviews
IAEA missions and international cooperation form part of the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant (RNPP) safety and waste management oversight. The IAEA’s IRRS and other technical support missions help Bangladesh strengthen regulatory frameworks, emergency preparedness, transport safety, and waste management practices . Cooperation with Russian technical partners (Rosatom, AtomEnergoMash) include technology transfer, supply of waste treatment equipment and implementation support.
5. Challenges and Identified Gaps
5.1. Institutional Capacity and Human Resources
Operating an NPP and a comprehensive waste management program requires experienced regulatory staff, trained operators, waste safety specialists and long-term institutional capacity for monitoring and record retention. Bangladesh is building capacity but will require continued training, recruitment and retention strategies. This is emphasized in recent literature and national SWOT analyses .
5.2. Public Perception and Stakeholder Engagement
Surveys indicate public concerns over radioactive waste and environmental risk. Transparent communication, community engagement and clear demonstration of safety measures are essential to maintain social license and minimize misinformation . Studies in Bangladesh reveal ongoing concerns that must be addressed through targeted outreach .
5.3. Long-term Disposal Strategy and Financial Planning
While the IGA for repatriation reduces near-term spent fuel burdens, long-term strategies for low-level and intermediate-level waste disposal, decommissioning liabilities and funding mechanisms (waste funds, operator responsibility) must be formalized and financed over decades . Interim storage designs must be robust to bridge the gap to a final disposal solution .
5.4. Transport and Cross-border Logistics for Repatriation
Repatriation requires safe transport by road , rail or sea, international regulatory compliance (IAEA Type B packages for SNF), bilateral coordination and contingency planning . Ensuring secure, timely repatriation over the plant’s lifetime is logistically non-trivial.
6. Summary
It has been shown in Table 2 that the radioactive waste streams at RNPP are comprehensively categorized according to international standards VLLW, LLW, ILW and HLW. The table summarizes the origin, physical form, and initial treatment requirements for fifteen distinct waste types derived from the VVER-1200 operations. Crucially, the data distinguishes between high-activity, heat-generating Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF), which is slated for repatriation 50 to 60 tons annually and the lower-activity wastes (VLLW, LLW and ILW), which are managed domestically through methods like filtration, ion exchange and subsequent solidification and interim storage.
Table 2. Observation of recent investigations on various types of radioactive waste treatment and management at RNPP.

SL No.

Waste Category

Specific Waste Type/ Form

Treatment/ Composition (Source)

Ref.

01.

Very Low-Level Waste

Clothing

Slightly contaminated materials.

02.

Very Low-Level Waste

Filters

Slightly contaminated materials, from gas/ liquid processing

03.

Very Low-Level Waste

Construction Waste

Slightly contaminated materials (e.g., during decommissioning)

04.

Low-Level Waste

Contaminated Tools

Low activity items

05.

Low-Level Waste

Resins (non-specific, implied)

Low activity items, generated from ion-exchange processes

06.

Low-Level Waste

Sludges

Low activity items, often resulting from liquid waste treatment

07.

Intermediate-Level Waste

Reactor Internals

Higher activity items, require shielding but not heat management

08.

Intermediate-Level Waste

Some Ion-Exchange Resins

Higher activity items, require shielding but not heat management

09.

Liquid Radioactive Waste

Corrosive Liquids

Highly mobile and corrosive; treated by chemical precipitation, ion exchange, and electrodialysis

10.

Liquid Radioactive Waste

Aqueous Effluents

Liquid streams requiring removal of contaminants

11.

High-Level Waste

Spent Nuclear Fuel

Highly radioactive, generates significant heat, consists of used fuel assemblies

12.

High-Level Waste Quantity

50-60 tons annually

Estimated annual production based on RNPP's 2.4 GWe capacity

13.

Gaseous Waste

Radioactive Gases

Processed through filtration and adsorption systems to remove radionuclides

14.

Solid Waste (General)

Conditioned Waste Packages

Residues from liquid treatment or processed VLLW/ LLW/ ILW

15.

Solid Waste (General)

Sludge Handling Modules

Residues generated from liquid waste treatment (mentioned in LRW equipment)

7. Conclusions
Rooppur is a landmark project that demands best-in-class radioactive waste management. The key strength is the strategic policy choice outlined in the 2019 National Policy and the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) for Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) repatriation, which eliminates the most significant long-term high-level waste (HLW) disposal burden for Bangladesh. Furthermore, the procurement of modern LRW treatment systems is a necessary step towards safe operations. However, the domestic challenge for LILW disposal, long-term financing and institutional capacity-building (especially for BAERA) remains paramount. The continuous implementation of IAEA recommendations, securing the financial fund and building enduring public trust through transparency are the critical priorities that will define the long-term sustainability and safety of Bangladesh’s nuclear energy program. Based on this evaluation, the following recommendations are critical for ensuring the long-term safety and sustainability of waste management at the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant:
1). Continue to implement International Atomic Energy Agency, Integrated Regulatory Review Service recommendations and invest in regulatory training, inspection resources and enforcement mechanisms.
2). Establish and capitalize a waste management fund (operator contributions) that covers interim storage, conditioning, transport and eventual disposal/decommissioning costs.
3). Ensure vendor deliveries e.g., Sverdniikhimmash equipment, are fully tested and independent verification of performance is performed before routine operation.
4). Regularly review and exercise repatriation logistics, ensure cask loading and transport infrastructure meet International Atomic Energy Agency standards and maintain legal/contractual clarity with supplier countries.
5). Interim facilities for very low-level waste/ low-level waste should include environmental monitoring, maintenance plans and robust recordkeeping to allow future re-evaluation.
6). Implement ongoing public information campaigns, transparent monitoring results and community liaison offices to build trust.
7). Expand specialized training programs with the International Atomic Energy Agency and international partners in waste conditioning, decommissioning planning and transport safety.
Abbreviations

BAERA

Bangladesh Atomic Energy Regulatory Authority

BAEC

Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission

ESIA

Environmental and Social Impact Assessment

IAEA

International Atomic Energy Agency

IRRS

Integrated Regulatory Review Service

IGA

Intergovernmental Agreement

NPCBL

Nuclear Power Plant Company Bangladesh Limited

RNPP

Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant

Cubic Meter (Unit of Volume)

GWe

Gigawatts Electric (Electrical Output)

MWe

Megawatt Electric (Electrical Output)

MWt

Megawatts Thermal (Thermal Output)

VVER-1200

Vodo-Vodyanoi Energetichesky Reaktor (Water-Water Energetic Reactor-1200 MWe)

Acknowledgments
The authors express their sincere gratitude to the Abedin Research Lab (ARL), Dhaka University of Engineering & Technology, Gazipur-1707, Bangladesh for their invaluable cooperation and guidance throughout this compiled work.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Karim, R., Karim, M. E., Muhammad-Sukki, F., Abu-Bakar, S. H., Bani, N. A., Munir, A. B., & Mas’ ud, A. A. (2018). Nuclear energy development in Bangladesh: A study of opportunities and challenges. Energies, 11(7), 1672.
[2] Mizanur Rahman, M., Ajijul Hoq, M., & Abu Khaer, M. (2021). Radiological Safety Assessment Due to Severe Accidental Conditions of VVER-1200 Reactor of Bangladesh (pp. p. 240-241). URL:
[3] Faisal, S. I., Islam, M. S., & Soner, M. A. M. (2023). Prediction of radioactivity releases for a Long-Term Station Blackout event in the VVER-1200 nuclear reactor of Bangladesh. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 55(2), 696-706.
[4] Task Committee on Nuclear Effects of the Committee on Air, Noise and Radiation Management of the Environmental Engineering Division, American Society of Civil Engineers. (1982). Nuclear Waste Management. Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division, 108(1), 1-50.
[5] Manohar, S., Sugilal, G., Bajpai, R. K., Kaushik, C. P., & Raj, K. (2023). Radioactive waste management. In Nuclear fuel cycle (pp. 255-331). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
[6] Uddin, M. G., Moniruzzaman, M., & Khan, M. (2017). Evaluation of groundwater quality using CCME water quality index in the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant Area, Ishwardi, Pabna, Bangladesh. American Journal of Environmental Protection, 5(2), 33-43.
[7] Wikipediaorg. 2025. Wikipediaorg. [Online]. Available from:
[8] Kader, M. S. F., Kar, T. S., & Nahar, A. (2024). Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant: A New Era for Power Sector in Bangladesh, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp. 110-115. ISSN (Online): 2455-9024.
[9] Abram, T., & Ion, S. (2008). Generation-IV nuclear power: A review of the state of the science. Energy Policy, 36(12), 4323-4330.
[10] Vujić, J., Antić, D. P., & Vukmirović, Z. (2012). Environmental impact and cost analysis of coal versus nuclear power: The US case. Energy, 45(1), 31-42.
[11] VVER plant layout, Retrieved from: The VVER today: Evolution, Design, Safety, pp-21. URL:
[12] Ye, D., Lai, X., Luo, Y., & Liu, A. (2020). Diagnostics of nuclear reactor coolant pump in transition process on performance and vortex dynamics under station blackout accident. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 52(10), 2183-2195.
[13] RNPP brochure of govt.; Retrieved from:
[14] Haydar, M. A., Hasan, M. M., Jahan, I., Fatema, K., Ali, M. I., Paul, D., & Khandaker, M. U. (2021). The status of NORMs in natural environment adjacent to the Rooppur nuclear power plant of Bangladesh. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 53(12), 4114-4121.
[15] Saha, S. A. B. H. A. S. A. C. H. I., Koushik, R., Souvik, R., & Asfakur RMd, Z. H. (2018). Rooppur nuclear power plant: current status & feasibility. Journal of mechanical engineering, vol. 68, no. 3, 167 - 182.
[16] Rahman, R. O. A., Rakhimov, R. Z., Rakhimova, N. R., & Ojovan, M. I. (2014). Cementitious materials for nuclear waste immobilization. John Wiley & Sons.
[17] Kumari, I., Kumar, P., & Srihari, B. K. (2025). Radioactive Waste: Treatment and Management. Global Waste Management, 195-214.
[18] Hou, X., & Roos, P. (2008). Critical comparison of radiometric and mass spectrometric methods for the determination of radionuclides in environmental, biological and nuclear waste samples. Analytica chimica acta, 608(2), 105-139.
[19] Turick, C. E., & Berry, C. J. (2016). Review of concrete biodeterioration in relation to nuclear waste. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 151, 12-21.
[20] F. Yeasmin, "Nuclear Waste Management in the context of the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant: Challenges and Opportunities for Bangladesh," SSRG International Journal of Industrial Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-6, 2021. ISSN: 2349 - 9362
[21] Ahmed, I., Joni, H. D., & Pranti, H. N. (2019). Study of radioactive waste management of nuclear power plant: prospect of Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant. Global J. Res. Eng.: Mech. Mech. Eng, 19, 69-79.
[22] Okoshi, M., & Momma, T. (2015). Radioactive waste treatment technologies. In Radioactive Waste Engineering and Management (pp. 119-151). Tokyo: Springer Japan.
[23] Government of Bangladesh, Ministry of Science and Technology, "National Policy for the Management of Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel-2019," Extraordinary Gazette, October 31, 2019.
[24] Mahmud, A. A., Soner, M. A. M., Hossain, M. M., Hossain, M. S., Usha, T. Y., Islam, M. M., & Jahan, N. (2022). Experiences and challenges of nuclear safeguards activities in Bangladesh. International Journal of Nuclear Safety and Security, 1(2), 124-136.
[25] Mikhailov, S. A. (2022). History and prospects of cooperation between Russia, India and Bangladesh in the field of nuclear energy. RUDN Journal of World History, 14(4), 427-442.
[26] The Business Standard (TBS), "Deal signed for liquid radioactive waste management at Rooppur NPP,” July 6, 2022. (Online). Available:
[27] Rahman, A. (2023, January). Creation of a Disposal Facility for the Very Low-Level Radioactive Waste at the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant (RNPP). In International Conference on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, Decommissioning, Environmental Protection and Remediation: Ensuring Safety and Enabling Sustainability. Book of Abstracts (No. IAEA-CN--318, pp. 153-153). URL:
[28] Jha, S. (2018). Building Rooppur: Saurav Jha looks at the unique role India will have in providing industrial support for Bangladesh's Rooppur nuclear plant. Nuclear Engineering International, 63(771), 14-16. URL:
[29] International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), “IAEA Observes Commitment to Operational Safety at Bangladesh’s First Nuclear Power Plant,” Press Release on Pre-OSART Mission, Vienna, August 2025.
[30] Fahim, F., Al Farabi, A., Hasan, M. S., & Sayam, S. N. R. (2024). Nuclear energy In Bangladesh: A SWOT analysis. Heliyon, 10(11).
[31] Alfee, S. L., & Islam, M. S. (2021). Assessment of public perception towards the radioactive waste management of Bangladesh. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 140, 103916.
[32] Abedin, M. Z., Rahman, M. W., & Chowdhury, M. S. (2023). Efficiency analysis of nuclear power plants: A comprehensive review. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews.
[33] A. R. Rasel, Rosatom to manage radioactive waste at Rooppur plant, Dhaka Tribune, October 22, 2025.
[34] Miah, M. A. H. (2023). Welding Defects Analysis with Various Alloys Using TIG and MIG Welding Process, Transactions on Engineering and Computing Sciences, 11(4), pp. 99-116.
[35] Islam, S., Abedin, M. Z., Ahsan, Z., Miah, M. A. H., Iqubal, A. M. S., Ahmed, M. M. S., Rahman, M., Hye, M. A., Sikder, M. R. K., Gani, M. O., Islam, M. A., & Kiron, M. S. M. (2023). Questionnaires with Answers on the Automotive Engine Fundamentals: Bangladesh Perspective. American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 8(3), 55-82.
[36] GUIDE, D. S. (2010). IAEA Safety Standards. Structure, 1(1.10), 1-10.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Islam, S., Hossen, M. J., Rahman, M. A., Abedin, M. Z., Islam, J., et al. (2026). Radioactive Waste Management and Safety Frameworks for VVER-1200 Reactors at the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant: A Comprehensive Review. American Journal of Energy Engineering, 14(2), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajee.20261402.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Islam, S.; Hossen, M. J.; Rahman, M. A.; Abedin, M. Z.; Islam, J., et al. Radioactive Waste Management and Safety Frameworks for VVER-1200 Reactors at the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant: A Comprehensive Review. Am. J. Energy Eng. 2026, 14(2), 45-55. doi: 10.11648/j.ajee.20261402.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Islam S, Hossen MJ, Rahman MA, Abedin MZ, Islam J, et al. Radioactive Waste Management and Safety Frameworks for VVER-1200 Reactors at the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant: A Comprehensive Review. Am J Energy Eng. 2026;14(2):45-55. doi: 10.11648/j.ajee.20261402.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajee.20261402.11,
      author = {Samsul Islam and Md. Jakir Hossen and Md. Ashikur Rahman and Mohammad Zoynal Abedin and Jahirul Islam and Nurul Hoda Sanid and Zahid Ahsan and Amanullah Moral and Md. Saiful Islam and Al-Amin and Md. Tasdid Hasan and Md Sajedul Islam and Md. Erfanul Hasan Sakib and Md. Abdulla Al Korais and Abdur Rahman Muin and Md. Mobashir Hosain and Md. Fardouse Alam and Mohammad Monirul Kabir Mridha and Md. Hossain Ali and Md. Rezaul Karim Sikder and Shariful Islam and Md Ashraful Islam Bhuiyan},
      title = {Radioactive Waste Management and Safety Frameworks for VVER-1200 Reactors at the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant: A Comprehensive Review},
      journal = {American Journal of Energy Engineering},
      volume = {14},
      number = {2},
      pages = {45-55},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajee.20261402.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajee.20261402.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajee.20261402.11},
      abstract = {Bangladesh's entry into the nuclear age with the construction of its first commercial nuclear power project, the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant (RNPP), featuring two Generation III+ VVER-1200 units supplied by the Russian Federation, is a significant step towards achieving energy security. However, this significant technological advancement necessitates the parallel establishment of robust, internationally compliant strategies for the safe and sustainable management of radioactive waste (RW). This comprehensive review systematically synthesizes the proposed and implemented approaches for RW treatment, disposal, and regulatory oversight at the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant, providing a critical analysis of the country's "National Policy on Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel Management-2019" and associated bilateral agreements. The primary finding highlights the strategic success of the policy, which mandates the repatriation of all high-level waste (Spent Nuclear Fuel, SNF) back to Russia, thereby eliminating the nation's most significant long-term nuclear liability. This agreement effectively offloads the burden of managing an estimated 50-60 tons of highly radioactive waste annually (fuel inventory and discharge estimates commensurate with 2.4 GWe plant capacity). Conversely, the review focuses on the domestic challenge of managing Low and Intermediate-Level Waste (LILW), examining the specialized technical systems for treating solid radioactive waste (SRW), liquid radioactive waste (LRW), and gaseous waste, including solidification processes and interim storage plans. Furthermore, the paper critically outlines the required strengthening of the regulatory framework under the Bangladesh Atomic Energy Regulatory Authority (BAERA) and identifies critical long-term gaps. These gaps include the absence of a formalized repository for final disposal of Low and Intermediate-Level Waste, the need for fully capitalized financial assurance funds, and the necessity for sustained investment in institutional capacity and human resources. This review contributes a vital synthesis to the literature on nuclear new build programs, particularly for developing nations, by detailing strategic solutions and outlining the immediate technical, regulatory, and financial priorities required to ensure the long-term safety and sustainability of the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant.},
     year = {2026}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Radioactive Waste Management and Safety Frameworks for VVER-1200 Reactors at the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant: A Comprehensive Review
    AU  - Samsul Islam
    AU  - Md. Jakir Hossen
    AU  - Md. Ashikur Rahman
    AU  - Mohammad Zoynal Abedin
    AU  - Jahirul Islam
    AU  - Nurul Hoda Sanid
    AU  - Zahid Ahsan
    AU  - Amanullah Moral
    AU  - Md. Saiful Islam
    AU  - Al-Amin
    AU  - Md. Tasdid Hasan
    AU  - Md Sajedul Islam
    AU  - Md. Erfanul Hasan Sakib
    AU  - Md. Abdulla Al Korais
    AU  - Abdur Rahman Muin
    AU  - Md. Mobashir Hosain
    AU  - Md. Fardouse Alam
    AU  - Mohammad Monirul Kabir Mridha
    AU  - Md. Hossain Ali
    AU  - Md. Rezaul Karim Sikder
    AU  - Shariful Islam
    AU  - Md Ashraful Islam Bhuiyan
    Y1  - 2026/04/10
    PY  - 2026
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajee.20261402.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajee.20261402.11
    T2  - American Journal of Energy Engineering
    JF  - American Journal of Energy Engineering
    JO  - American Journal of Energy Engineering
    SP  - 45
    EP  - 55
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2329-163X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajee.20261402.11
    AB  - Bangladesh's entry into the nuclear age with the construction of its first commercial nuclear power project, the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant (RNPP), featuring two Generation III+ VVER-1200 units supplied by the Russian Federation, is a significant step towards achieving energy security. However, this significant technological advancement necessitates the parallel establishment of robust, internationally compliant strategies for the safe and sustainable management of radioactive waste (RW). This comprehensive review systematically synthesizes the proposed and implemented approaches for RW treatment, disposal, and regulatory oversight at the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant, providing a critical analysis of the country's "National Policy on Radioactive Waste and Spent Nuclear Fuel Management-2019" and associated bilateral agreements. The primary finding highlights the strategic success of the policy, which mandates the repatriation of all high-level waste (Spent Nuclear Fuel, SNF) back to Russia, thereby eliminating the nation's most significant long-term nuclear liability. This agreement effectively offloads the burden of managing an estimated 50-60 tons of highly radioactive waste annually (fuel inventory and discharge estimates commensurate with 2.4 GWe plant capacity). Conversely, the review focuses on the domestic challenge of managing Low and Intermediate-Level Waste (LILW), examining the specialized technical systems for treating solid radioactive waste (SRW), liquid radioactive waste (LRW), and gaseous waste, including solidification processes and interim storage plans. Furthermore, the paper critically outlines the required strengthening of the regulatory framework under the Bangladesh Atomic Energy Regulatory Authority (BAERA) and identifies critical long-term gaps. These gaps include the absence of a formalized repository for final disposal of Low and Intermediate-Level Waste, the need for fully capitalized financial assurance funds, and the necessity for sustained investment in institutional capacity and human resources. This review contributes a vital synthesis to the literature on nuclear new build programs, particularly for developing nations, by detailing strategic solutions and outlining the immediate technical, regulatory, and financial priorities required to ensure the long-term safety and sustainability of the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant.
    VL  - 14
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Radioactive Waste Management at the Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant (RNPP)
    3. 3. Regulatory and Safety Policy Frame-work for VVER-1200 Reactors
    4. 4. On-site Waste Treatment and Technical Equipment for RNPP
    5. 5. Challenges and Identified Gaps
    6. 6. Summary
    7. 7. Conclusions
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgments
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information